DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mitsubishi Mirage vs 2002 Holden Cruze Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Cruze

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeHolden
MirageModelCruze
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

165 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1298 ccEngine displacement1490 cc
88 HPPower100 HP
108 NmTorque138 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank41 lt
—Urban consumption7,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
155/80 R13 STyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4290 mmLength3625 mm
1690 mmWidth1640 mm
1395 mmHeight1605 mm
970 KgWeight1000 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mitsubishi Mirage and 2002 Holden Cruze approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Cruze leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…