DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mitsubishi Mirage vs 2017 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Mirage

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeCitroen
MirageModelC3
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typeCrossover
5Seats—
4Doors—

Performance

—0–100 km/h14,9 s
0 km/hTop speed168 km/h
1193 ccEngine displacement1199 cc
78 HPPower82 HP
100 NmTorque118 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank42 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—TransmissionManual
165/65 R14; 175/55 R15Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4305 mmLength3996 mm
1669 mmWidth1749 mm
1504 mmHeight1490 mm
955 KgWeight980 kg
—Luggage capacity300 lt
2550 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Citroen C3Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsRear Parking SensorsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mitsubishi Mirage and 2017 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Mirage leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…