DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mitsubishi Minica vs 2000 Honda Z Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Z

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeHonda
MinicaModelZ
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
4Seats4
3Doors3

Performance

105 km/hTop speed130 km/h
659 ccEngine displacement659 cc
64 HPPower64 HP
97 NmTorque93 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
32 ltFuel tank35 lt
—Urban consumption10 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
155/65 R13 HTyre size175/80 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3295 mmLength3395 mm
1395 mmWidth1475 mm
1475 mmHeight1675 mm
700 KgWeight970 Kg
2260 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mitsubishi Minica and 2000 Honda Z approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Z leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…