DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Alfa Romeo 146 vs 1996 Alfa Romeo 145 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 146

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeAlfa Romeo
146Model145
2000Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

12,8 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
179 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1351 ccEngine displacement1351 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
115 NmTorque115 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption10,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,3 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4257 mmLength4093 mm
1712 mmWidth1712 mm
1425 mmHeight1427 mm
1175 KgWeight1147 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Alfa Romeo 146 and 1996 Alfa Romeo 145 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 146 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…