DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mitsubishi Legnum vs 2002 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Legnum

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeLand Rover
LegnumModelFreelander
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,8 s
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
140 HPPower117 HP
181 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption12,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,1 lt
—Average consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/50 R16VTyre size195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4740 mmLength4368 mm
1760 mmWidth1809 mm
1470 mmHeight1708 mm
1550 KgWeight1510 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mitsubishi Legnum and 2002 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Legnum leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…