DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Mitsubishi Legnum vs 2001 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Legnum

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeLand Rover
LegnumModelFreelander
2001Model year2001
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,9 s
0 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
140 HPPower120 HP
181 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank59 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,6 lt
—Average consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/50 R16VTyre size195/80 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4740 mmLength4382 mm
1760 mmWidth1805 mm
1470 mmHeight1760 mm
1550 KgWeight1380 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2560 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Mitsubishi Legnum and 2001 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Legnum leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…