DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2016 Mitsubishi Outlander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Lancer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMitsubishi
LancerModelOutlander
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,2 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2360 ccEngine displacement2268 cc
168 HPPower150 HP
226 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
59 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
215/45 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4625 mmLength4695 mm
1760 mmWidth1810 mm
1480-1505 mmHeight1680 mm
1350 KgWeight1600 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2016 Mitsubishi Outlander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…