2003 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0i 16V (265 Hp) 2003Overall Score75.75/100
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2005 Audi TT Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Audi
TT
Audi TT 1.8 T (225 Hp) 2005Overall Score76.5/100
WINNER
Audi TT
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationAudi TT
MitsubishiMakeAudi
LancerModelTT
2003Model year2005
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
4Doors2
Performance
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationAudi TT
6,1 s0–100 km/h6,6 s
245 km/hTop speed243 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
265 HPPower225 HP
355 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationAudi TT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank62 lt
15,4 ltUrban consumption13,3 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
10,9 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationAudi TT
4490 mmLength4041 mm
1770 mmWidth1764 mm
1450 mmHeight1345 mm
1410 KgWeight1465 Kg
2625 mmWheelbase2429 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2005 Audi TT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Audi TT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSPeugeot 207 vs Mitsubishi Lancer2006 and 2003 model yearsImage unavailableVSAudi TT vs Mitsubishi Lancer2005 and 2003 model years
VSAudi A3 vs Mitsubishi Lancer2005 and 2003 model years
VSAudi A4 vs Mitsubishi Lancer2005 and 2003 model years
VSToyota Caldina vs Mitsubishi Lancer1999 and 2003 model yearsComments are loading…