2003 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0i 16V (265 Hp) 2003Overall Score75.75/100
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2006 Peugeot 207 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Peugeot
207
Peugeot 207 2.0 (280 Hp) 2006Overall Score76.5/100
WINNER
Peugeot 207
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationPeugeot 207
MitsubishiMakePeugeot
LancerModel207
2003Model year2006
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats2
4Doors3
Performance
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationPeugeot 207
6,1 s0–100 km/h—
245 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
265 HPPower280 HP
355 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationPeugeot 207
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank80 lt
15,4 ltUrban consumption—
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationPeugeot 207
4490 mmLength4030 mm
1770 mmWidth1800 mm
1450 mmHeight—
1410 KgWeight1150 Kg
2625 mmWheelbase2560 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2006 Peugeot 207 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Peugeot 207 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSPeugeot 207 vs Mitsubishi Lancer2006 and 2003 model yearsImage unavailableVSAudi TT vs Mitsubishi Lancer2005 and 2003 model years
VSAudi A3 vs Mitsubishi Lancer2005 and 2003 model years
VSAudi A4 vs Mitsubishi Lancer2005 and 2003 model years
VSToyota Caldina vs Mitsubishi Lancer1999 and 2003 model yearsComments are loading…