DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2012 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Lancer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolvo
LancerModelS40
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
198 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
59 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4570 mmLength4476 mm
1760 mmWidth1770 mm
1505 mmHeight1454 mm
1365 KgWeight1498 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2012 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…