DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2011 Great Wall Cowry Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Cowry

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeGreat Wall
LancerModelCowry
2011Model year2011
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
4Doors4

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
150 HPPower143 HP
198 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank0 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption—
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,1 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4570 mmLength4574 mm
1760 mmWidth1704 mm
1505 mmHeight1845 mm
1365 KgWeight1510 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2011 Great Wall Cowry approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Cowry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…