DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2004 Toyota Mark II Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Lancer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeToyota
LancerModelMark II
2006Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

5,9 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2492 cc
280 HPPower280 HP
383 NmTorque378 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
15,4 ltUrban consumption20 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption12 lt
10,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/45 R17Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4490 mmLength4735 mm
1770 mmWidth1760 mm
1450 mmHeight1460 mm
1320 KgWeight1570 Kg
2625 mmWheelbase2780 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2004 Toyota Mark II approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…