1998 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 (280 Hp) 1998Overall Score80.75/100
1998 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2000 Toyota Mark II Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Toyota
Mark II
Toyota Mark II 2.5 i 24V Turbo (280 Hp) 2000Overall Score81.75/100
WINNER
Toyota Mark II
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationToyota Mark II
MitsubishiMakeToyota
LancerModelMark II
1998Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationToyota Mark II
4,9 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2492 cc
280 HPPower280 HP
383 NmTorque378 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationToyota Mark II
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/45 ZR17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationToyota Mark II
4350 mmLength4760 mm
1770 mmWidth1760 mm
1415 mmHeight1400 mm
1260 KgWeight1400 Kg
2510 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2000 Toyota Mark II approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Mark II leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSComments are loading…