DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 1996 Ford Escort Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Escort

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

66.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
LancerModelEscort
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,1 s
0 km/hTop speed225 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1993 cc
270 HPPower220 HP
0 NmTorque290 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Average consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size225/45 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4310 mmLength4211 mm
1695 mmWidth1738 mm
1420 mmHeight1425 mm
1260 KgWeight1320 Kg
2510 mmWheelbase2552 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mitsubishi Lancer and 1996 Ford Escort approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Escort leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…