1996 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 (270 Hp) 1996Overall Score66.5/100
1996 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 1996 Eagle Talon Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Eagle
Talon
Eagle Talon 2.0 i 16V TSi 4WD (210 Hp) 1996Overall Score67.5/100
WINNER
Eagle Talon
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
66.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationEagle Talon
MitsubishiMakeEagle
LancerModelTalon
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors2
Performance
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationEagle Talon
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
270 HPPower210 HP
0 NmTorque290 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationEagle Talon
4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size205/55 R16V
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationEagle Talon
4310 mmLength4374 mm
1695 mmWidth1735 mm
1420 mmHeight1295 mm
1260 KgWeight1252 Kg
2510 mmWheelbase2509 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Mitsubishi Lancer and 1996 Eagle Talon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Eagle Talon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSFord Escort vs Mitsubishi Lancer1996 and 1996 model years
VSNissan Bluebird vs Mitsubishi Lancer1996 and 1996 model years
VSSubaru Impreza vs Mitsubishi Lancer1996 and 1996 model yearsVSEagle Talon vs Mitsubishi Lancer1996 and 1996 model years
VSNissan Avenir vs Mitsubishi Lancer1996 and 1996 model yearsComments are loading…