2004 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.8i 16V (125 Hp) 2004Overall Score59.5/100
2004 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2004 Volvo V50 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 2.0 D (136Hp) 2004Overall Score58.75/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Lancer
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.5–58.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationVolvo V50
MitsubishiMakeVolvo
LancerModelV50
2004Model year2004
—Body typeEstate
—Seats5
—Doors5
Performance
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationVolvo V50
—0–100 km/h9,6 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
125 HPPower136 HP
174 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationVolvo V50
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank52 lt
—Urban consumption7,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,6 lt
—Average consumption5,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationVolvo V50
—Length4522 mm
—Width1845 mm
—Height1457 mm
—Weight1472 Kg
—Wheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2004 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSMercedes-Benz Vaneo vs Mitsubishi Lancer2004 and 2004 model years
VSLand Rover Freelander vs Mitsubishi Lancer2004 and 2004 model years
VSAlfa Romeo 147 vs Mitsubishi Lancer2004 and 2004 model yearsVSVolvo V50 vs Mitsubishi Lancer2004 and 2004 model yearsImage unavailableVSMG ZR vs Mitsubishi Lancer2004 and 2004 model yearsComments are loading…