DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2002 MG ZR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMG
LancerModelZR
2002Model year2002
—Body typeHatchback
—Seats5
—Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,0 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
125 HPPower113 HP
174 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption7,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size205/50 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4011 mm
—Width1690 mm
—Height1400 mm
—Weight1155 Kg
—Wheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2002 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…