DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2000 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Lancer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeLand Rover
LancerModelFreelander
2000Model year2000
—Body typeOff-road vehicle
—Seats5
—Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,9 s
0 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
125 HPPower120 HP
174 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank59 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,6 lt
—Average consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—Drivetrain4x4
—Gears5
—Tyre size195/80 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4382 mm
—Width1805 mm
—Height1760 mm
—Weight1380 Kg
—Wheelbase2560 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2000 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…