DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Audi A6 vs 1997 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi L 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

61.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeMitsubishi
A6ModelL 200
1997Model year1997
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats4
4Doors4

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed142 km/h
2461 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
115 HPPower100 HP
265 NmTorque240 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank75 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/80 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4797 mmLength4500 mm
1783 mmWidth1655 mm
1430 mmHeight1570 mm
1460 KgWeight1810 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2230 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Audi A6 and 1997 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi L 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…