DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Audi A6 vs 1998 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

61.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A6SpecificationFord Ranger
AudiMakeFord
A6ModelRanger
1997Model year1998
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Audi A6SpecificationFord Ranger
11,2 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2461 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
115 HPPower109 HP
265 NmTorque266 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A6SpecificationFord Ranger
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A6SpecificationFord Ranger
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A6SpecificationFord Ranger
4797 mmLength5020 mm
1783 mmWidth1695 mm
1430 mmHeight1750 mm
1460 KgWeight1399 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Audi A6 and 1998 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…