1992 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.8 16V (140 Hp) 1992Overall Score47.25/100
1992 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 1992 Bertone Freeclimber Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1992 • Bertone
Freeclimber
Bertone Freeclimber 2.0 (129 Hp) 1992Overall Score48/100
WINNER
Bertone Freeclimber
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
47.25–48
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationBertone Freeclimber
MitsubishiMakeBertone
LancerModelFreeclimber
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats4
4Doors3
Performance
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationBertone Freeclimber
7,6 s0–100 km/h—
240 km/hTop speed160 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
140 HPPower129 HP
168 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationBertone Freeclimber
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption—
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationBertone Freeclimber
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/50 R14Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationBertone Freeclimber
1040 KgWeight—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Mitsubishi Lancer and 1992 Bertone Freeclimber approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Bertone Freeclimber leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSComments are loading…