DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2010 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Lancer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolvo
LancerModelC30
2010Model year2010
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4/5Doors3

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
191 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
117 HPPower114 HP
154 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
59 ltFuel tank52 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption4,3 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption3,5 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4570 mmLength4266 mm
1760 mmWidth1782 mm
1480 mmHeight1447 mm
1260 KgWeight1354 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2010 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…