2006 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.6 i 16V (98 Hp) 2006Overall Score53.25/100
2006 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2006 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 16V (100 Hp) 2006Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationFord C-Max
MitsubishiMakeFord
LancerModelC-Max
2006Model year2006
EstateBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationFord C-Max
12,6 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
181 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1584 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
98 HPPower100 HP
150 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationFord C-Max
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationFord C-Max
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationFord C-Max
4485 mmLength4330 mm
1695 mmWidth1820 mm
1480 mmHeight1600 mm
1360 KgWeight1234 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2006 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…