2005 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.6 i 16V (98 Hp) 2005Overall Score53.25/100
2005 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2005 Ford Focus Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 1.6 Duratec 16V (100 Hp) 2005Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Ford Focus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationFord Focus
MitsubishiMakeFord
LancerModelFocus
2005Model year2005
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5
Performance
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationFord Focus
12,6 s0–100 km/h13,6 s
181 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1584 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
98 HPPower100 HP
150 NmTorque143 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationFord Focus
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption10,4 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationFord Focus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationFord Focus
4485 mmLength4342 mm
1695 mmWidth1840 mm
1480 mmHeight1497 mm
1360 KgWeight1242 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2005 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…