2004 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.6 i 16V (98 Hp) 2004Overall Score50.25/100
2004 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2004 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Volkswagen
Caddy
Volkswagen Caddy 1.6 (102 Hp) 2004Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Caddy
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
MitsubishiMakeVolkswagen
LancerModelCaddy
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats5/7
5Doors5
Performance
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
12,6 s0–100 km/h13,7 s
181 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1584 ccEngine displacement1595 cc
98 HPPower102 HP
150 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption10,4 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
4485 mmLength4405 mm
1695 mmWidth1802 mm
1480 mmHeight1833 mm
1360 KgWeight1446-1567 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2682 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2004 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…