DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 1996 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Lancer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeRenault
LancerModelMegane
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
190 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
113 HPPower98 HP
137 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption6,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size185/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4275 mmLength4440 mm
1690 mmWidth1699 mm
1385 mmHeight1420 mm
1020 KgWeight1135 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mitsubishi Lancer and 1996 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…