1992 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.6 16V (113 Hp) 1992Overall Score53.25/100
1992 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 1993 Fiat Croma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1993 • Fiat
Croma
Fiat Croma 1993Overall Score52.25/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Lancer
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationFiat Croma
MitsubishiMakeFiat
LancerModelCroma
1992Model year1993
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationFiat Croma
9,8 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
190 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1929 cc
113 HPPower94 HP
137 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationFiat Croma
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationFiat Croma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size175/70 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationFiat Croma
—Length4520 mm
—Width1760 mm
—Height1430 mm
1050 KgWeight1240 Kg
—Wheelbase2660 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Mitsubishi Lancer and 1993 Fiat Croma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…