DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2003 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Lancer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeAudi
LancerModelA3
2003Model year2003
—Body typeHatchback
—Seats5
—Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,9 s
0 km/hTop speed189 km/h
1468 ccEngine displacement1595 cc
105 HPPower102 HP
140 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption9,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,3 lt
—Average consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4152 mm
—Width1735 mm
—Height1427 mm
—Weight1090 Kg
—Wheelbase2513 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2003 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…