2000 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.5i (105 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
2000 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2000 Toyota Raum Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Toyota
Raum
Toyota Raum 1.5 i 16V (94 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Lancer
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationToyota Raum
MitsubishiMakeToyota
LancerModelRaum
2000Model year2000
—Body typeMinivan
—Seats5
—Doors5
Performance
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationToyota Raum
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1468 ccEngine displacement1496 cc
105 HPPower94 HP
140 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationToyota Raum
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption11 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationToyota Raum
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
—Tyre size175/65 R14 S
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationToyota Raum
—Length4045 mm
—Width1685 mm
—Height1535 mm
—Weight1090 Kg
—Wheelbase2520 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2000 Toyota Raum approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…