2000 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.5 (110 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
2000 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2000 Audi A3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Audi
A3
Audi A3 1.6i (102 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Lancer
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationAudi A3
MitsubishiMakeAudi
LancerModelA3
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5
Performance
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationAudi A3
—0–100 km/h10,9 s
0 km/hTop speed189 km/h
1468 ccEngine displacement1595 cc
110 HPPower102 HP
137 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationAudi A3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption9,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,3 lt
—Average consumption6,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationAudi A3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R13Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationAudi A3
4290 mmLength4152 mm
1690 mmWidth1735 mm
1395 mmHeight1427 mm
1020 KgWeight1090 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2513 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2000 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…