1996 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.5 (110 Hp) 1996Overall Score55.5/100
1996 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 1996 Mitsubishi Colt Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Mitsubishi
Colt
Mitsubishi Colt 1.6 GLXi 16V (CA4A) 1996Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Colt
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationMitsubishi Colt
MitsubishiMakeMitsubishi
LancerModelColt
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationMitsubishi Colt
—0–100 km/h9,7 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1468 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
110 HPPower113 HP
137 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationMitsubishi Colt
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Average consumption7,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationMitsubishi Colt
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R13Tyre size175/70 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationMitsubishi Colt
4290 mmLength3955 mm
1690 mmWidth1690 mm
1395 mmHeight1365 mm
1020 KgWeight959 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2440 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Mitsubishi Lancer and 1996 Mitsubishi Colt approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Colt leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…