DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2000 Proton Persona 300 Compact Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Proton Persona 300 Compact

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeProton
LancerModelPersona 300 Compact
1996Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h13,6 s
170 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1298 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
108 NmTorque108 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption10,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,5 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/80 R13Tyre size175/70 R13
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4275 mmLength3990 mm
1690 mmWidth1698 mm
1385 mmHeight1365 mm
940 KgWeight960 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2440 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2000 Proton Persona 300 Compact approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Proton Persona 300 Compact leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…