1998 • Audi
A6
Audi A6 2.4 V6 30V (136 Hp) 1998Overall Score66.5/100
1998 Audi A6 vs 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Mitsubishi
Challenger
Mitsubishi Challenger 2.8 TD (140 Hp) 1998Overall Score67.5/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Challenger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
66.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi A6SpecificationMitsubishi Challenger
AudiMakeMitsubishi
A6ModelChallenger
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Audi A6SpecificationMitsubishi Challenger
0 km/hTop speed155 km/h
2393 ccEngine displacement2835 cc
136 HPPower140 HP
230 NmTorque314 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi A6SpecificationMitsubishi Challenger
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank74 lt
—Urban consumption15 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi A6SpecificationMitsubishi Challenger
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size265/70 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi A6SpecificationMitsubishi Challenger
4796 mmLength4530 mm
1810 mmWidth1775 mm
1451 mmHeight1730 mm
—Weight1850 Kg
2759 mmWheelbase2725 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Audi A6 and 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Challenger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…