DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 1994 Nissan Terrano Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Terrano

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

61.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeNissan
L 200ModelTerrano
1994Model year1994
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

152 km/hTop speed155 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2388 cc
90 HPPower103 HP
240 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption16 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,6 lt
—Average consumption12,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/80 R16Tyre size215/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4500 mmLength4365 mm
1655 mmWidth1690 mm
1570 mmHeight1680 mm
1820 KgWeight1540 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Mitsubishi L 200 and 1994 Nissan Terrano approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Terrano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…