DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2006 Great Wall Sailor Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Sailor

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeGreat Wall
L 200ModelSailor
2006Model year2006
Pick-upBody typePick-up
4Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

142 km/hTop speed150 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2237 cc
100 HPPower105 HP
240 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
—Average consumption10,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/80 R16Tyre size215/75 R15

Dimensions

4500 mmLength5135 mm
1655 mmWidth1690 mm
1570 mmHeight1705 mm
1810 KgWeight1510 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase3025 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2006 Great Wall Sailor approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Sailor leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…