DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2006 Ford Escape Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Escape

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
L 200ModelEscape
2006Model year2006
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

142 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
100 HPPower135 HP
240 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank57 lt
—Urban consumption8,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears—
205/80 R16Tyre size235/70 R16

Dimensions

4500 mmLength4394 mm
1655 mmWidth1780 mm
1570 mmHeight1702 mm
1810 KgWeight1745 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2619 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2006 Ford Escape approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Escape leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…