DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi L 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeSuzuki
L 200ModelGrand Vitara
2004Model year2004
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats4
4Doors3

Performance

142 km/hTop speed150 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
100 HPPower92 HP
240 NmTorque226 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Urban consumption10 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/80 R16Tyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4500 mmLength3810 mm
1655 mmWidth1700 mm
1570 mmHeight1690 mm
1810 KgWeight1200 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi L 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…