DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2007 Landwind SUV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi L 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

62.5–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeLandwind
L 200ModelSUV
2007Model year2007
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

14,6 s0–100 km/h—
167 km/hTop speed140 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2800 cc
136 HPPower92 HP
314 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank63 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/80 R16Tyre size245/75 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

5000 mmLength4800 mm
1750 mmWidth1800 mm
1775 mmHeight1750 mm
1935 KgWeight1935 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2007 Landwind SUV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi L 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…