DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2006 Kia Carnival Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Carnival

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeKia
L 200ModelCarnival
2006Model year2006
Pick-upBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

14,6 s0–100 km/h13,8 s
167 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
136 HPPower150 HP
314 NmTorque224 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption14,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption10,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/80 R16Tyre size215/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

5000 mmLength4925 mm
1750 mmWidth1900 mm
1775 mmHeight1735 mm
1935 KgWeight1915 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2905 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2006 Kia Carnival approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Carnival leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…