DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2012 Isuzu D-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Isuzu D-Max

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3 points.

62.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeIsuzu
L 200ModelD-Max
2014Model year2012
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h—
167 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
136 HPPower136 HP
314 NmTorque280 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank76 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size225/75 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

5185 mmLength5030 mm
1750 mmWidth1800 mm
1775 mmHeight1715 mm
1870 KgWeight1470 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase3050 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2012 Isuzu D-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Isuzu D-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…