DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2015 Great Wall Steed Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi L 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeGreat Wall
L 200ModelSteed
2014Model year2015
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
167 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2378 cc
136 HPPower122 HP
314 NmTorque200 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption—
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,5 ltAverage consumption12,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5185 mmLength5040 mm
1750 mmWidth1800 mm
1775 mmHeight1730 mm
1870 KgWeight—
3000 mmWheelbase3050 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2015 Great Wall Steed approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi L 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…