DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2018 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2014 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi L 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 2 points.

70.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMitsubishi
L 200ModelL 200
2018Model year2014
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
179 km/hTop speed179 km/h
2442 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
181 HPPower178 HP
430 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,0 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
245/65 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5205 mmLength5185 mm
1815 mmWidth1750 mm
1780 mmHeight1775 mm
1860 KgWeight1900 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2018 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2014 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi L 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 2 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…