DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2017 Mitsubishi Triton Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi L 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMitsubishi
L 200ModelTriton
2017Model year2017
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h—
179 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2442 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
181 HPPower136 HP
430 NmTorque324 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption—
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
245/65 R17Tyre size245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5205 mmLength5280 mm
1815 mmWidth1815 mm
1780 mmHeight1780 mm
1860 KgWeight1820 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2017 Mitsubishi Triton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi L 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…