DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2014 Volvo V60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolvo
L 200ModelV60
2015Model year2014
Pick-upBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
179 km/hTop speed215 km/h
2442 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
181 HPPower163 HP
430 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank67 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption—
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,1 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
245/65 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5205 mmLength4635 mm
1815 mmWidth1899 mm
1780 mmHeight1484 mm
1860 KgWeight—
3000 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2014 Volvo V60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…