DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2004 Toyota Highlander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Highlander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeToyota
L 200ModelHighlander
2004Model year2004
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,8 s
142 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2362 cc
132 HPPower157 HP
192 NmTorque221 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption10,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/80 R16Tyre size225/70 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4500 mmLength4685 mm
1655 mmWidth1825 mm
1570 mmHeight1735 mm
1660 KgWeight1580 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2715 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2004 Toyota Highlander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Highlander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…