DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2000 Land Rover Discovery Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Discovery

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

59.5–60.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeLand Rover
L 200ModelDiscovery
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h15,3 s
142 km/hTop speed157 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2496 cc
132 HPPower136 HP
192 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank95 lt
—Urban consumption11,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,2 lt
—Average consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/80 R16Tyre size235/70 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4500 mmLength4710 mm
1655 mmWidth1860 mm
1570 mmHeight1890 mm
1660 KgWeight2020 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2000 Land Rover Discovery approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Discovery leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…