DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mitsubishi GTO vs 2000 Honda NSX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi GTO

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

77.75–77.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeHonda
GTOModelNSX
1999Model year2000
CoupeBody typeCoupe
2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,7 s
0 km/hTop speed274 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement3179 cc
280 HPPower280 HP
417 NmTorque298 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption16,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,1 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption11,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/45 R17Tyre size215/45 R17; 245/40 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength4425 mm
1840 mmWidth1810 mm
1285 mmHeight1170 mm
1710 KgWeight1410 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2530 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mitsubishi GTO and 2000 Honda NSX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi GTO leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…