DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mitsubishi GTO vs 1996 Dodge Stealth Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Dodge Stealth

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

77.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeDodge
GTOModelStealth
1996Model year1996
CoupeBody typeCoupe
2Seats2+2
2Doors2

Performance

0 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
280 HPPower226 HP
417 NmTorque278 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption17 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/45 R17Tyre size245/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength4565 mm
1840 mmWidth1840 mm
1285 mmHeight1253 mm
1710 KgWeight1760 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2470 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mitsubishi GTO and 1996 Dodge Stealth approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Dodge Stealth leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…