DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Audi A6 vs 2019 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 14 points.

89.5–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A6SpecificationFord Mondeo
AudiMakeFord
A6ModelMondeo
2016Model year2019
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Audi A6SpecificationFord Mondeo
6,7 s0–100 km/h9,1 s
250 km/hTop speed214 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
252 HPPower160 HP
370 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A6SpecificationFord Mondeo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank62 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A6SpecificationFord Mondeo
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
7 S tronicGears6
—TransmissionAutomatic
225/50 R17Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A6SpecificationFord Mondeo
4943 mmLength4871 mm
1874 mmWidth1852 mm
1461-1482 mmHeight1482 mm
1725 KgWeight1504 kg
—Luggage capacity429 lt
2912 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Audi A6

No additional feature records are available.

Ford MondeoDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeHill Start AssistCruise ControlCollision Avoidance SystemDriver Fatigue DetectionComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip ComputerKeyless StartArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsFront Parking SensorsRear Parking SensorsReversing CameraAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetoothNavigation

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Audi A6 and 2019 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 14 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…