DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Mitsubishi Galant vs 2003 Holden Caprice Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Galant

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeHolden
GalantModelCaprice
2005Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3828 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
230 HPPower233 HP
250 NmTorque375 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank75 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption—
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/60 R16Tyre size225/55 R16V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4865 mmLength5237 mm
1840 mmWidth1847 mm
1485 mmHeight1459 mm
1560 KgWeight1722 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2939 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Mitsubishi Galant and 2003 Holden Caprice approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Galant leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…